HOME

MULE’: Looking For Some Sense From Georgia Loss

October 31, 2008   -   © 2008 Tiger Rag
| Decrease font size for Post - MULE’: Looking For Some Sense From Georgia Loss - Football - TigerRag | Reset to normal font size for Post - Football - TigerRag - MULE’: Looking For Some Sense From Georgia Loss | Increase font size for Post - MULE’: Looking For Some Sense From Georgia Loss |

Now, if someone told you beforehand that LSU would score 38 points against the Georgia Bulldogs, would you have been elated?

by Marty Mule’
Tiger Rag Featured Columnist

Of course you would have.

Generally speaking, that point total should be more than enough to win a football game.

But not with these Bayou Bengals.

For the second time in three games, LSU – with a ballyhooed defense that was supposed to be a major strength as the Tigers defended their 2007 national championship – got mowed for 50 points in humiliating defeats.

What happened?

Seven games into what was expected to be a title-contending season, one thing is clear: this LSU unit cannot defend against a multi-dimensional offense. The Tigers’ only two notable victories, against Auburn and South Carolina, were against mediocre teams overall, with limited offensive capability. Two opponents, Florida and Georgia, that could both run and pass, buzz-bombed LSU for a combined 103 points.

This is not to say the Tigers should be unbeaten. It is to say nobody gave any indication that this LSU team would be beaten to a pulp.

Twice.

Why things happen on a football field are usually far more complex, but it’s hard to escape two conclusions about this team: (1) either this staff really was winning the last few years with Nick Saban’s players, or (2) the current defensive players are being coached down.

It’s hard to find any other sound reasons.

Sad to say, there may be more to come, with Alabama and the best Ole Miss team in years on the horizon.

And please don’t point out the Tigers get them both at home. We saw what that was worth against Georgia.

* * *

Next up, of course, is Tulane, LSU’s oldest and, at one time, most hated rival.

No more, thanks to a variety of reasons, but at one time both schools brought out the virulent emotions of the other. The largest crowds in the South used to crowd into Tulane Stadium, then the largest football venue in the South, to see them play.

Each played a great role in the history of the other. It’s always been fascinating to realize that in 1924, in the first game at Tiger Stadium, “the worse place in the world to be a visiting team,’’ according to Bear Bryant, Tulane gave LSU a 13-0 baptism.

Two years before that, Tulane figured in the first traffic survey in Baton Rouge. The day of the game, the survey showed that 2,280 automobiles chugged into town. Also noted were nine motorcycles, 32 horseback riders, 21 buggies, 50 horse-drawn vehicles, two bicycles, one tractor, and, the hardiest fans, 30 people who hiked in.

This is how much the Green Wave occupied the Tigers’ mindset: In 1949, a year after Tulane administered a monstrous 46-0 whipping on LSU – at the time the worse differential in the series – Coach Gus Tinsley started practicing for the Greenies the week before their meeting at halftime of another game.

Tinsley knew full well that Tulane, a well-oiled football machine powered by All-American fullback Eddie Price, was more than capable of burying LSU again if the Wave got rolling. And given an opportunity, knew Tulane would.

“The week before the Tulane,” Charles Cusimano, a guard on the ’49 Tigers and later a member of the school’s Board of Supervisors, “we had a big lead over Southeastern in the third quarter. Gus Tinsley sent the first and second teams outside the stadium, to a field behind the South End, and we scrimmaged while the scrubs finished the game. Ed McKeever and Norm Cooper, Tinsley’s chief assistants, came out with us and we actually began putting in some of the things we planned to use against Tulane. Can you imagine doing this today?”

McKeever, a longtime associate of Notre Dame’s silver-tongued Frank Leahy, motivated the team in the days leading up to Tulane.

“During the week,’’ Cusimano said, “he talked to us in groups. Real emotional talks. Before the game it was right out of Knute Rockne. He started out softly, then built up. At the end he was screaming.’’

Kenny Konz remembered just before the kickoff the spellbinding pregame oratory, given with tears in McKeever’s eyes, of a baby he said died in his arms and how she’d be looking down, watching the game and pulling for the Tigers.’’

“The most amazing thing of that day,’’ Konz said, “was that nobody was hurt as we all hit the door trying to get out on that field.’’

LSU upset the Greenies – and took their expected place in the Sugar Bowl.

Marty Mule’ can be reached at MJM981@Charter.net.

Comments

2 Responses to “MULE’: Looking For Some Sense From Georgia Loss”

  1. louis scheppegrell on October 31st, 2008 4:20 pm

    Coached down or not coached at all can be the only explanation. You don’t recruit in the top 10 each year and rank 9th in defense in the SEC with 12 teams. Well, I guess you can add one more axion to football; when you have 2 defensive coordinators, you have none.

  2. LSU4EVER on October 31st, 2008 6:45 pm

    I have to say, it’s definitely #2. Anyone who knows anthing about football has watched better coaches (i.e. most of them) in the SEC abuse the defense that is loaded with talent. We all saw MS St. run trips right (or left) with a tight-end on the weak-side and loop a back out of the backfield…about 10 times! It was once overthrown by first time starter Tyson Lee that should have been a sure TD. MS St, which has trouble moving the ball against tall grass, scored 24 points on the hapless LSU defense. AU had it’s best offensive day against LSU. Check out the stats on our defense:

    Scoring defense # 11, Passing defense # 10, Turnover Margin # 9, Red Zone Defenst # 12, Total Defense # 9, TFL # 9.

    Does anyone remember when our defense stats have been this bad? And with this talent?

    We all saw South Carolina use the tight-end on a 5 yard X-ing route, over and over again, until finally scoring a TD before halftime. No adjustment was made until half-time.

    Against FL ,we saw nothing at all from our defense. Miles, repeatedly tells us that the DB’s problems in coverage is fixable…but that is what the Spring & Summer practices are for, not at mid-season. He tells us the DL is trying to hard, to overcome no defense game plan…maybe! Remember, he is talking about, among others, Jai Eugene 06, Chad Jones 07, & Patrick Peterson 08, who were all rated 5-star & #1 at their respective positions by one ranking service or another. Saban, who took particular interest in DB’s, so he could cover 1 on1 and blitz and ditate to other SEC offenses what he will allow them to do, would make these guys lock-down DB’s!

    Against GA, our Co-Coordinators (sic), rarely blitz during the first half and then decided to blitz almost every down in the second half, leaving 1 on 1 coverage that Stafford quickly beat. They continued to blitz DB’s & safeties (even the announcers were calling it) even though it was never effective.

    Why is it that our DB’s look so confused on the field almost every game. Saban’s defense was one of the most complex in all of college football and I only once remember (Capital One Bowl) an obvious botched assignment. With one of the most talented defense lines in the country (4-6 may go on to play in the NFL) our team is giving up points in record numbers.

    I have never been impressed with Miles. Even in the NC season, he managed to lose to KY & AR, who didn’t have 1/3 of the talent that LSU had. I wonder how long his NC will save his job in Baton Rouge. I would gladly trade Miles for Rich Rod & Michigan, straight up!

    Never have I seen Les(s) from More (Talent).

Got something to say?









Site by Compucast Interactive